Multi-tenant RLS architecture
Tenant-scoped data and row-level security policies protect account boundaries across the platform.
- Tenant-scoped tables
- Account-bound policies
- User-request boundaries
Security and governance
Trust, security, and governance for enterprise teams
Squawker publishes a direct trust surface for security overview, RLS architecture, data residency options, subprocessors, privacy posture, monitoring, and SOC 2 preparation.
SOC 2 is in preparation.
Security review map
Give enterprise buyers the review path up front.
Trust content should be direct: what is ready, what is in preparation, which dependencies exist, and who to contact when security review gets specific.
Data residency and subprocessors
The trust page lists residency options and core subprocessors so enterprise teams can review dependencies early.
- Residency options
- Core providers
- Procurement review path
Call recording consent and privacy posture
Call recording, consent, retention, and privacy details need a plain public explanation before enterprise security review.
- Consent posture
- Retention review
- Privacy escalation
Monitoring and disclosure
Sentry monitoring, incident response, SOC 2 preparation, and vulnerability contact details belong on one public route.
- Sentry monitoring
- Incident response
- Security contact
Why buyers care
The work behind the claim.
- RLS diagram
- Subprocessors list
- SOC 2 preparation copy
- Security FAQ
Multi-tenant RLS architecture
Tenant-scoped data and row-level security policies protect account boundaries across the platform.
- Tenant-scoped tables
- Account-bound policies
- User-request boundaries
Data residency and subprocessors
The trust page lists residency options and core subprocessors so enterprise teams can review dependencies early.
- Residency options
- Core providers
- Procurement review path
Call recording consent and privacy posture
Call recording, consent, retention, and privacy details need a plain public explanation before enterprise security review.
- Consent posture
- Retention review
- Privacy escalation
Monitoring and disclosure
Sentry monitoring, incident response, SOC 2 preparation, and vulnerability contact details belong on one public route.
- Sentry monitoring
- Incident response
- Security contact
Product views
See the workflow surfaces.
These views show how Squawker organizes conversations, records, tasks, and follow-up across the platform.
Frequently asked questions
Is SOC 2 complete?
No. SOC 2 is in preparation and public copy must not imply completion.
How does Squawker isolate account data?
Tenant-scoped tables use account boundaries and RLS policies so user requests only access permitted records.
Does Squawker publish a subprocessors list?
The trust page should list core infrastructure and communication providers so enterprise buyers can review dependencies early.
Can customers discuss data residency?
Yes. The public page should introduce residency options, then move specific requirements into the security review conversation.
How should call recording consent be handled?
Consent requirements vary by market and deployment. Squawker should document the posture clearly and review customer-specific requirements before rollout.
Where should security concerns be sent?
Security concerns should route through the contact path with enough context for the team to triage vulnerability reports and enterprise review requests.
Does the trust page prove partner logos or case studies?
No. Public partner proof should stay off the trust page unless legal and commercial approval is explicit.
What should procurement review first?
Procurement should review data isolation, subprocessors, retention, call consent, monitoring, incident response, and SOC 2 preparation status.
Next paths
Continue the evaluation.
Product truth guardrails
- Mobile copy uses Private preview / TestFlight parity work.
- WhatsApp copy uses approved managed sender rollout language.
- SOC 2 copy uses in preparation.
- Public pricing uses $1.50 and never exposes the internal default.
- No LeadVenture public logo or named case study ships in Phase 1 without approval.